Ice Age Floods Terrain Guide
Education resources

Read the flood in the landscape.

These live tools support observation, comparison, evidence-based argument, and primary-source work. Start with the map, then move between the terrain and the records that explain it.

Open the interactive map
Inquiry sequence

Build an explanation from multiple records.

The same workflow scales from a short classroom exercise to an undergraduate research prompt. Students should distinguish observations in the catalog from interpretations in source text.

01
Choose a site on the map and describe the visible landform without first reading its interpretation.
02
Open the nearest 360 trail. Record what the ground-level route reveals that a topographic map does not.
03
Find nearby erratics or historical notes. Separate measured facts, such as elevation and lithology, from later conclusions.
04
Use the combined evidence to argue for water direction, minimum depth, or the process that formed the feature.
Example investigation

Can a boulder mark flood depth?

Plot a group of Willamette Valley erratics by elevation. Ask what their positions establish, what assumptions are required, and what other evidence would strengthen the claim.

Data
Location, elevation, dimensions, and lithology from the erratic catalog.
Map
Relative position within the mapped flood extent and modern valley.
Claim
A defensible minimum water level, with uncertainty stated explicitly.
Source practice

Credit the underlying work.

This is an independent Terrain360 guide assembled from multiple sources. Each record should be cited using the source and catalog details shown on its page. Follow external links for the authoritative publication or agency record, and do not treat this site as an official NPS or IAFI publication.

Read the data method